In short

  • About 1 in 6 students (16.6%) comes from a low-income family, vs. 60.5% statewide.1
  • About 1 in 7 (14.2%) is learning English, vs. 24.3% statewide.1
  • About 1 in 5 (20.3%) is in gifted classes, vs. 8.7% statewide. About 1 in 6 (15.9%) gets special education, close to the state.1

How it works

  • The state counts students every fall and reports the groups they belong to. These numbers are from the 2024-25 report.1
  • “Low-income” here means “economically disadvantaged.” That mostly means a student can get free or lower-cost school meals.2
  • “At risk” is a state label for students who may drop out. It covers many reasons, such as failing a test, being held back or learning English.2
  • Groups overlap. One student can be in more than one group.

What the numbers show

DistrictStudentsLow-incomeLearning EnglishGifted classesAt risk
Leander42,50716.6%14.2%20.3%38.2%
Round Rock46,84627.1%19.5%15.0%39.0%
Georgetown13,85338.5%19.1%6.3%43.7%
Austin72,17551.1%31.4%13.9%48.5%
Liberty Hill9,81217.9%10.1%10.7%37.4%
Hutto10,66741.2%18.1%7.5%53.5%
Texas5,530,49960.5%24.3%8.7%53.5%

Source: Texas Education Agency, 2024-25 school report for each district (fall count).13

  • Leander has the lowest share of low-income students of these districts. Liberty Hill is close.13
  • Leander has the highest share in gifted classes, about twice the state rate.13
  • About 4 in 10 Leander students are labeled “at risk,” about the same as Round Rock and Liberty Hill.13

The other side

  • A low share is not zero. About 7,000 Leander students come from low-income families.1
  • Compare the same groups. Districts with different shares of low-income students are hard to compare on overall scores. Comparing the same groups of students is fairer. See peer districts.
  • Gifted shares depend on rules. Each district sets its own way to pick students for gifted classes, so the shares are not a perfect comparison.
  • Some money follows these counts. Fewer low-income students means less of some state and federal money, which is tied to these counts.

Changes to this page

  • Nov. 2, 2026: Rewrote the questions to ask so each is open, neutral and addressed to the public body.
  • Nov. 2, 2026: We checked every figure against its source. We reworded the other-side points so they stick to what the sources show.

Questions to ask

  • How does the district compare results for low-income students and English learners with nearby districts?
  • How does the district pick students for gifted classes?

What we still don’t know

  • How these shares differ from school to school. This page uses district totals only.

Footnotes

  1. Texas Education Agency, 2024-25 Texas Academic Performance Report, Leander ISD (246913), Student Information, pages 28-29, membership column: total 42,507; economically disadvantaged 7,064 (16.6%; state 60.5%); EB students/EL 6,020 (14.2%; state 24.3%); gifted and talented 8,613 (20.3%; state 8.7%); special education 6,759 (15.9%; state 15.3%); at-risk 16,237 (38.2%; state 53.5%). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4 ↩5 ↩6 ↩7 ↩8 ↩9

  2. Texas Education Agency, 2024-25 Comprehensive TAPR Glossary, Student Information definitions of economically disadvantaged (eligible for free or reduced-price lunch or other public help) and at-risk (at risk of dropping out under state law). ↩ ↩2

  3. Same 2024-25 reports, Student Information, membership column, for Round Rock ISD (246909), Georgetown ISD (246904), Austin ISD (227901), Liberty Hill ISD (246908) and Hutto ISD (246906). ↩ ↩2 ↩3 ↩4